Point 1: It seems to me that if you have a closed system, entropy will increse. You don’t have to quantify anything.
Point 2: In using the second law of themodynamics, they are not trying to refute science. They are refuting atheism.
Point 3: Your comment about Sammantha Stevens is irrelevant.
Exactly, you don't have a closed system so entropy does not govern or dominate.
Point 2: In using the second law of themodynamics, they are not trying to refute science. They are refuting atheism.
Although created by God, physics and the laws of thermodynamics are agnostic,
Point 3: Your comment about Samantha Stevens is irrelevant.
However God created everything was a process. If He didn't "abracadabra" everything into existence, what processes do you suggest He used?