Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Natural Law

Point 1: It seems to me that if you have a closed system, entropy will increse. You don’t have to quantify anything.
Point 2: In using the second law of themodynamics, they are not trying to refute science. They are refuting atheism.
Point 3: Your comment about Sammantha Stevens is irrelevant.


21 posted on 11/20/2009 7:10:44 PM PST by broncobilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: broncobilly
"Point 1: It seems to me that if you have a closed system, entropy will increase. You don’t have to quantify anything."

Exactly, you don't have a closed system so entropy does not govern or dominate.

Point 2: In using the second law of themodynamics, they are not trying to refute science. They are refuting atheism.

Although created by God, physics and the laws of thermodynamics are agnostic,

Point 3: Your comment about Samantha Stevens is irrelevant.

However God created everything was a process. If He didn't "abracadabra" everything into existence, what processes do you suggest He used?

30 posted on 11/20/2009 7:19:06 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson