Open Letter On Climate Legislation
*****************************Small EXCERPT************************
Posted by Jeff Id on November 13, 2009
An open letter reply to a letter written to government by 18 different scientific organizations concerning climate change legislation by Dr. Arnd Bernaerts.
The original letter:
****************************snip*************************
Subject: Letter to Senators concerning climate change legislation 21.Oct.2009 (right top box).
Dear President or Executive Director,
How could it happen that more than a dozen of the most prestigious scientific associations signed and submitted this letter on climate change without having ensured that the used terminology is sufficiently defined. Good science can and is required to work with reasonable terms and explanations. The science about the behaviour of the atmosphere should be no exception. But WMO1, IPCC and other institutions simply are using the laymans term of weather and climate not even recognizing that this is very unscientifically.
**************************************8snip*************************************
29 Responses to Open Letter On Climate Legislation
and within this we have the single response:
********************************************EXCERPT********************************
FOIA said
We feel that climate science is, in the current situation, too important to be kept under wraps.
We hereby release a random selection of correspondence, code, and documents.
Hopefully it will give some insight into the science and the people behind it.
This is a limited time offer, download now: http://ftp.tomcity.ru/incoming/free/FOI2009.zip
Sample:
0926010576.txt * Mann: working towards a common goal
1189722851.txt * Jones: try and change the Received date!
0924532891.txt * Mann vs. CRU
0847838200.txt * Briffa & Yamal 1996: too much growth in recent years makes it difficult to derive a valid age/growth curve
0926026654.txt * Jones: MBH dodgy ground
1225026120.txt * CRUs truncated temperature curve
1059664704.txt * Mann: dirty laundry
1062189235.txt * Osborn: concerns with MBH uncertainty
0926947295.txt * IPCC scenarios not supposed to be realistic
0938018124.txt * Mann: something else causing discrepancies
0939154709.txt * Osborn: we usually stop the series in 1960
0933255789.txt * WWF report: beef up if possible
0998926751.txt * Carefully constructed model scenarios to get distinguishable results
0968705882.txt * CLA: IPCC is not any more an assessment of published science but production of results
1075403821.txt * Jones: Daly death cheering news
1029966978.txt * Briffa last decades exceptional, or not?
1092167224.txt * Mann: not necessarily wrong, but it makes a small difference (factor 1.29)
1188557698.txt * Wigley: Keenan has a valid point
1118949061.txt * wed like to do some experiments with different proxy combinations
1120593115.txt * I am reviewing a couple of papers on extremes, so that I can refer to them in the chapter for AR4