Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Typical_Whitey
DO NOT take your eyes off Copenhagen. All it takes is for Hillary or some other agent of the US government to sign something and we'll be committed to cap and trade, whether in reality or under the table.
3 posted on 11/17/2009 6:40:55 AM PST by Carry_Okie (Islam offers three choices: surrender, fight, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie

(Climate Change Meltdown), Carry_Okie wrote:
DO NOT take your eyes off Copenhagen. All it takes is for Hillary or some other agent of the US government to sign something and we’ll be committed to cap and trade, whether in reality or under the table.


You sir, are correct!
For goodness sakes, the rest of you who are already celebrating, get a grip. Anything detrimental to the US, he will do.


9 posted on 11/17/2009 6:46:49 AM PST by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie
Only if the US manages to reduce its excessive energy consumption, commit itself to mandatory CO2 emission reduction targets and help finance the move away from oil for poorer countries, is there still a chance that countries like China and India will do the same and that a dangerous warming of the Earth can be stopped.

Let's see if I've got this straight. If the USA ruins its economy, and gives all its money to 3rd world countries, China and India might be stupid enough to follow.

What a deal!

11 posted on 11/17/2009 6:49:36 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Joe Wilson said "You lie!" in a room full of 500 politicians. Who was he talking about?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie
All it takes is for Hillary or some other agent of the US government to sign something and we'll be committed to cap and trade, whether in reality or under the table.

Article 2, Section 2 of the constitution: He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;

So we would not necessarily be committed unless the Senate ratifies. Yes, keep your eyes on Copenhagen. But watch the Senate. And watch efforts to change its role in the ratification of treaties.

14 posted on 11/17/2009 6:54:00 AM PST by newheart ("It will keep the government out of your health care decisions..." Barack Obama, July 23, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie; All

> DO NOT take your eyes off Copenhagen.

You are SO correct!

If there's anything we know about "Obama the Man-Child", he is EASILY MANIPULATED by people from whom he seeks APPROVAL. Adoration is Obama's Achilles Heel.

This German “Der Spiegel” opinion piece is part of a Leftist effort meant to SHAME der reckless Obama into signing the damn pact.

Here's the LAST two paragraphs:

The Copenhagen summit, which is just three weeks away, is not lost yet. But if the worst-case scenario becomes reality at Copenhagen and at the follow-up conferences — if, in other words, world leaders ignore the findings of the global scientific community — then the US will find itself in a very uncomfortable position. America will be seen as the primary culprit of global warming — and this after the US, with its rampant real estate speculation, has given us a global economic crisis which has not only destroyed assets, but pushed 100 million people worldwide into hunger. With that kind of track record, the US hardly has a claim any more to the leadership of the Western world — let alone a Nobel Peace Prize for its leader.

A world of flooded coasts, dried-up rivers and disappearing rainforests will lead to massive refugee movements and conflict. The Nobel Committee should postpone the award of the Nobel Peace Prize from Dec. 10 to Dec. 20. Only if Obama has achieved a convincing deal at the Copenhagen conference will there be a real reason to honor him.


16 posted on 11/17/2009 6:55:31 AM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

Deserves repeating:

“DO NOT take your eyes off Copenhagen. All it takes is for Hillary or some other agent of the US government to sign something and we’ll be committed to cap and trade, whether in reality or under the table.”


22 posted on 11/17/2009 6:58:27 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie
DO NOT take your eyes off Copenhagen. All it takes is for Hillary or some other agent of the US government to sign something and we'll be committed to cap and trade, whether in reality or under the table.

Very good assessment! 0bama and the dims can't get anything done the right way, but if they have the opportunity they can think of 100 ways to do it illegally or under the table.

32 posted on 11/17/2009 7:10:15 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Pork Eating Crusader - FUBO! Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie
DO NOT take your eyes off Copenhagen. All it takes is for Hillary or some other agent of the US government to sign something and we'll be committed to cap and trade, whether in reality or under the table.

IF Hillary aspires to any public office in her future I do not see her getting anywhere near this. I think this will be shuffled off to the umbrella of the UN.

35 posted on 11/17/2009 7:12:01 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

They can sign anything they want at Copenhagen, unless it gets ratified by the Sentate, it won’t mean a thing. There are still some things that Obama can’t do by executive decree (at least for now.)


36 posted on 11/17/2009 7:12:39 AM PST by NavVet ("You Lie!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

I don’t think so. Anything signed at Copenhagen is merely a symbolic agreement unless a treaty is ratified by two thirds of the senate. There’s no way that can happen. Cap and trade is DOA in the senate regardless of what happens in Copenhagen.


38 posted on 11/17/2009 7:21:40 AM PST by your local physicist (If the Canadians and Brazilians can drill for oil off their Atlantic coast, why can't we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

Agreed. See my last few posts.


52 posted on 11/17/2009 7:56:02 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

No, it does come down to the need for a treaty to be ratified.


67 posted on 11/17/2009 8:12:09 AM PST by ConservativeMind (I love it every time a criminal dies at the hands of a victim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

We’re not committed to any treaty unless and until it’s approved by the Senate. Obama can sign whatever he wants...it will have the effect as Clinton signing the kyoto Accords. Zilch.


92 posted on 11/17/2009 9:07:54 AM PST by pgkdan ( I miss Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson