Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoHebrew
Hasan didn’t target civilians. He hit a clear military target. The appropriate term then isn’t terrorism. It’s treason.

Hasan has pronounced sympathy for suicide bombers and has had communication with those who advocate the same. I would contend that there was no military objective to the Hasan massacre except to kill non-muslims in the name of Islam which does make it perpetrated for political \ religious reasons.

BTW, if the scene had been an airport or a mall, the Dems and their Controlled Media would still argue that this was not terrorism.
47 posted on 11/15/2009 1:25:01 PM PST by etradervic (Democrat uber deficit spending proves that the swine flu originated in DC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: etradervic

I agree with everything you said. I just don’t think it’s “terrorism” because Hassan didn’t target civilians. He’s a treasonous, murdering jihadi. But he attacked a military base, not a civilian target (such as a mall or restaurant).


49 posted on 11/15/2009 3:14:05 PM PST by ChicagoHebrew (Hell exists, it is real. It's a quiet green meadow populated entirely by Arab goat herders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson