To: ChicagoHebrew
Hasan didnt target civilians. He hit a clear military target. The appropriate term then isnt terrorism. Its treason.
Hasan has pronounced sympathy for suicide bombers and has had communication with those who advocate the same. I would contend that there was no military objective to the Hasan massacre except to kill non-muslims in the name of Islam which does make it perpetrated for political \ religious reasons.
BTW, if the scene had been an airport or a mall, the Dems and their Controlled Media would still argue that this was not terrorism.
47 posted on
11/15/2009 1:25:01 PM PST by
etradervic
(Democrat uber deficit spending proves that the swine flu originated in DC)
To: etradervic
I agree with everything you said. I just don’t think it’s “terrorism” because Hassan didn’t target civilians. He’s a treasonous, murdering jihadi. But he attacked a military base, not a civilian target (such as a mall or restaurant).
49 posted on
11/15/2009 3:14:05 PM PST by
ChicagoHebrew
(Hell exists, it is real. It's a quiet green meadow populated entirely by Arab goat herders.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson