Maddow Complains Labeling Hasan Terrorist Would ‘Paint the Democrats as Soft on Terror’ [ADMITS IT]

Newsbusters ^ | November 13, 2009 - 12:05 | Jeff Poor

[chuck_the_tv_out]

Dems: party uber amerika, party uber alles.

[duckman]

Has anyone seen Captain Obvious?

[jackibutterfly]

"Has anyone seen Captain Obvious?"

obambi? He's in China.

[UCFRoadWarrior]

The odd thing is.....Rachel Madcow would be one of the first people Islamic Terrorists like Dr Hasan would be-head....she may like muzzies...but muzzies do not like women with jobs, wearing pants, having sex with other women.....

[Billthedrill]

It’s hardly surprising. And I guarantee you Maddow would not recognize this as a case of bias. Fish don’t notice water.

[Adder]

It’s a question to which there is an answer, a legal answer.”

And the answer is YES.

[yobid]

Who listens to that dude anyway?

[353FMG]

Hasan was looking for a wife. The two would’ve made such a handsome couple.

[Freedom2specul8]

Aw, do the democrats feel bad because we know they’re soft on terrorists?

[skully]

Lesbian dudes like Maddcow, would be among the first to be beheaded; while they try to sing kumbaya to their Muzzie aggressors. It would be like shooting fish in a barrel.

[RatRipper]

If the shoe fits. . . .

[FDNYRHEROES]

When Democrats push to close Gitmo, prosecute CIA agents, cripple the war on terror, and change terms to “Overseas Contingency Operations” and “Man Made Disasters” they are indeed painting themselves “Soft On Terror”. The unfortunate Hasan incident is just one more case of Reality messing up the Democrat’s version of Reality and it is in conflict with their own rhetoric.

[Red in Blue PA]

ROFL! Nail on the head post.

[PowderMonkey]

"It’s a question to which there is an answer, a legal answer.”

Time travel. I didn't think it possible, but it's happening. It's September 10, 2001, and we're going to take a hit in the shorts. Again. Big time.

[Spok]

‘Maddow Complains Labeling Hasan Terrorist Would ‘Paint the Democrats as Soft on Terror’

So what’s her point?

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

You know,...it's actually much worse than just being soft on the Jihad's....

They in fact are using them to take out their hated enemy...America as the Constitution desscribes and enables it....so as to be able to form their Utopia...

See Horowitz's book...

Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left (Paperback)

...some will say...that is being said by Captain Obvious...

But most of the country doesn't understand that at all...and the Leftists are doing everything they can to keep things confused...

I think that article by WSJ's J.R. Dunn says in closing:

The terror conflict is a two-front war. It always has been, as reluctant as we have been to admit it. The time to open the second front is coming.

That article on FR is:

The left and terror

[Waryone]

Well, DUH!

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

As a Captain Obvious movement I propose a new keyword to be used for such threads....

leftistjihadalliance;

[SE Mom]

I actually laughed out loud- Maddow is delusional.

[Marine_Uncle]

Sounds good go me E. That is exactly what the are. Leftistjihadalliance. Surely more mainstream Americans are finally getting a clue as how these folks operate.