Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Constitutional Right to Public Funds (ACORN)
American Spectator ^ | 11/13/2009 | Matthew Vadum

Posted on 11/13/2009 3:33:56 AM PST by markomalley

Activist group and organized crime syndicate ACORN has a constitutional right to defraud the people of the United States it claims in a federal lawsuit.

Actually, the lawsuit, filed with the assistance of the allegedly terrorist-funded Center for Constitutional Rights, doesn't use the word fraud, but that's what it amounts to because ACORN argues in the document that it has a right to taxpayer dollars. I kid you not.

In the action filed in U.S. District Court ACORN plays the victim -- as always.

ACORN claims the congressionally approved cutoff of federal funding that expires Dec. 18 violates the Constitution's prohibition on bills of attainder, along with ACORN's free speech and due process rights.

Of course, due process is a rather specific legal concept that applies to judicial proceedings, rather than the lawmaking process. A bill of attainder singles out an individual or group for punishment without trial.

Is it punishment for ACORN to be denied public funds? That implies the group has the right to receive those funds.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: acorn
In these days, one can't be sure that ACORN wouldn't win such a ludicrous lawsuit.
1 posted on 11/13/2009 3:33:57 AM PST by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

They don’t have to win. The Justice Department mearly needs to conceed and or not challenge the suit. Or it could be as easy as not showing up and the Plaintif is awarded judgement.


2 posted on 11/13/2009 3:52:32 AM PST by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Not that ACORN has such a right, but it's interesting to find their leadership elite advancing the notion that it's "their money" in "your pocket".

They do appear to be after a "payday".

The attitude is pure ghetto and street thug.

3 posted on 11/13/2009 3:52:48 AM PST by muawiyah (Git Out The Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

“The attitude is pure ghetto and street thug.”

It worked for Wall Street.


4 posted on 11/13/2009 3:56:23 AM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Drunk arrogance for our money!


5 posted on 11/13/2009 3:56:44 AM PST by growingpains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

This sounds like ACORN thinks it has a right to TAX.


6 posted on 11/13/2009 3:57:45 AM PST by BuffaloJack (All Dictators have their Henchmen; the President just calls them his Czars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

We need to concentrate on getting their boss’s boss’s boss out of the White House As Soon As Possible. When that’s done, and not until then, it will be fairly comparatively easy to drain the swamp — and drown the swamp rats!


7 posted on 11/13/2009 4:03:14 AM PST by JohnQ1 (Pray for peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
In these days, one can't be sure that ACORN wouldn't win such a ludicrous lawsuit.

File in the right district, and their win would be upheld at the appealate level.

This is why is was so important to have the judicial appointment reins during the Dubya years.

8 posted on 11/13/2009 4:25:54 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Joe Wilson speaks for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
How exactly is ACORN being punished here? It is still free to raise its own money from private sources.

But I'll bite on the Bill of Attainder argument. Congress has no business funding any non-government organization for any purpose, and in an ideal world, it would cut all such funding off.

9 posted on 11/13/2009 4:47:27 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
Congress has no business funding any non-government organization for any purpose, and in an ideal world, it would cut all such funding off.

Amen brother!

This has always been a way for the Dimmicrats to fund their friends.

10 posted on 11/13/2009 6:14:23 AM PST by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
In one civil action that might vie for the title of Most Transparently Vexatious Lawsuit In American History, CCR sued heavy machinery maker Caterpillar, Inc., after the death of Rachel Corrie, a 23-year-old American protester who was run over by an Israeli military Caterpillar D9 bulldozer on a mission in the "no man's land" near the Egyptian border in 2003.

Corrie put her body in the path of the bulldozer, hoping to obstruct its progress. The Israeli government claimed the tragic event was an accident. But even if the Israelis were covering up their own wrongdoing, how would that make Caterpillar responsible for Corrie's death? CCR doesn't care.

Why these transparently frivorlous law suits are not thrown out of court and the lawyers fined for bringing them to court amazes me.

And by the way it wan no accident. Corrie obviously committed suicide.

11 posted on 11/13/2009 6:15:21 AM PST by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on the objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.” James Madison.

ACORN is the edifice of the Cloward-Piven strategy.


12 posted on 11/13/2009 6:21:49 AM PST by La.daddyrabbit (Born and bred in the briar patch. Liberalism is the sickness, the Democratic party is the asylum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnQ1
We need to concentrate on getting their boss’s boss’s boss out of the White House As Soon As Possible.

I do believe that you have created the new acronym for our mutual feelings

OOT WHASAP! If we say like the commercials we could even say it in the 'hoods without fear (at least of being overheard)!

13 posted on 11/13/2009 6:50:53 AM PST by SES1066 (Cycling to conserve, Conservative to save, Saving to Retire, will Retire to Cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

If we wanted to use it, we’d surely want “...totally out...” to become TOOT WHASAP! It might drive libs crazi-
er.


14 posted on 11/13/2009 12:02:08 PM PST by JohnQ1 (Pray for peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson