You would think that something so seemingly obvious would deserve a “well duh,” but it seems pretty clear that most people who naively accept Darwinism do not fully realize that his "theory" assumes an already living being capable of reproduction. Think about that for a moment. Talk about assuming miracles! And yet Richard Dawkins and many other evo-atheists seem to think that Darwin's theory is some sort of universal acid that dissolves the need for God!
And let's face it, even in the narrow area of the origins debate where Darwin does speak, he is guilty of taking empirical evidence that pointed to minor variations within the various animal kinds and extrapolating it into a macro-evolutionary "theory" that is nothing more than his evo-atheist worldview being imposed on the evidence.
