Chicago Mayor Blames Fort Hood Masacre On Guns

http://www.radioviceonline.com ^ | November 10, 2009 | Jim Vicevich

[Biggirl]

The Mayor of Chicago, whose our city is dealing day in and day out with violent crime, and not long ago lost the 2016 summer olympics bid, says that the recent Fort Hood masacre is to be blamed on guns.

Does the Mayor honestly believe that a civilian ban on guns would have stopped this crazy Jihadist. Does the Mayor honestly think that a ban on possession would stop AQ from instructing and recruiting extremists to their cause in this country? It hasn’t stopped the drug lords from tearing up his city.

Before you watch the video, read this from Founding Bloggers, and make sure you read the entire post. It’s not long … but it is on the mark.

[Finny]

After getting tired of six months of heightened vigilance (but not increased armament), US military bases will go back to "business as usual", and be easy pickings for the next islamic nutcase the feds sort-of watched, but didn't want to hurt any feelings.

True, and there's more behind why I think the Ft. Hood Massacre is more significant than 911: American military personnel, no matter what branch of the service, who have Muslims serving next to them in their units or on their ships or subs or aircraft or battlefields, are being asked to put their faith in people they have reason to view with suspicion, and to put their lives at unjustified risk 24/7, even on supposedly safe "home" ground, solely because political correctness gets precedence. This will HAVE to create horrible morale in the ranks and do more damage to our military's fighting power than five 911s could ever do.

[Salamander]

Actually, it wasn’t the gun, per se, it was the bullets.

[DungeonMaster]

The question is “Are the moderates hearing this and is it moving them away from the idiotic left?”. The left will always be this blind.