Let’s just say that the evos aren’t nearly as excited to get this story out as creationists are. Initially the evos tried to make a case for dino soft-tissue being an illusion created by contamination. But, this has since been laid to rest, as the following National Geographic article makes clear:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/090501-oldest-dinosaur-proteins.html
You’ve just linked to a soft tissue story that is not a creationist site. Looks like my choice number 3 is right.
Neither side should be afraid of any raw data, and exposes weakness in their confidence in their position when they are.