Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Salgak

It’s a legalism. Until convicted by a court of law, the press has to refer to him as the “alleged” or “suspected” killer. . .


Forgive me, but I never studied “Has-To Law” in law school.

Is this a federal law, state law, administrative rule, or are you just an amateur making stuff up?


139 posted on 11/09/2009 8:47:56 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Even My Failures are Edible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Beelzebubba

It’s common sense in a toxic legal environment. If claimed by the press to be the killer, and if somehow found innocent by a court of law, he can claim and sue for libel.

Remember, you are not PROVEN to be guilty before convicted by a court of law. Even if everyone knows the facts, even if it was on live TV. . .


316 posted on 11/09/2009 5:21:20 PM PST by Salgak (Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border: I dare you to try and cross it. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson