To: Liz
All of the pundits claimed the race was "close" and that the counting would go on til the wee hours. However, Repub Christie came charging out of the gate well-ahead. Tgen two hours after the polls closed, he was declared the winner by a comfortable 5 points.
"declared the winner by a comfortable 5 points". Technically, that's correct as Christie's official win tally was 5 points".
More than likely Christie really won by 10 points, given the margin of fraud.
To: tanknetter
More than likely Christie really won by 10 points, given the margin of fraud. Agreed.
Which is something everyone on the right should consider before getting too ecstatic. All of those "close" seats in the house, held by Dems? Well, either the Republicans make serious headway against Dem fraud (unlikely, given past experience), or Republican candidates will need to have 8%+ margins to compensate for the fraud & deter Dem lawsuits. IOW, I doubt we are any closer to winning back these so called "close" seats in 2010 when we realize how much worse Dem fraud is going to be. They see this as all or nothing, their chance to permanently take over.
I'm not being defeatist, but we had better be prepared to duke it out, figuratively AND literally. That means we must take control of the GOP. The current RINO elite does not have the guts to fight back.
19 posted on
11/06/2009 6:04:32 AM PST by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
To: tanknetter
.......Christie's official win tally was 5 points. More likely Christie really won by 10 points, given the monumental voter fraud Dems routinely use to cook electoral results............... Excellent point. The dead were voting in Hudson County, as usual. Illegals voted under several identities. The buzz was Corzine was trying to fix the mail-in vote----to keep a reserve of votes in case it was "close."
21 posted on
11/06/2009 6:18:29 AM PST by
Liz
(ALL FOX---ALL THE TIME---24/7)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson