So you’re saying that “we” just have to be nicer to Muslims - like give them a state of their own - and they’ll quit doing what they have been doing NONSTOP since 700 AD.
Bullshit.
Nope. In fact, what I said was quite the opposite of giving them a place of their own. As for being nicer to Muslims, you simply aren't going to get the point so long as you insist on seeing all Muslims as indentical and interchangable. For the murderous jihadists, by all means go after them. We should so more to stop them than we are doing now. For the innocent Muslim who has no intention of hurting anyone? They shouldn't be treated like a murderous jihadist.
And if we really want to change the nature of our country so that it's permissible to persecute the innocent without trial or due process and it's OK to persecute people because of their religion, then we should define when it's permissible because leaving it to "It's OK to treat the Constitution as toilet paper if we are frightened enough," is not a good idea.