[bvw]

We are in the midst of that war already. It is a moral war, the death is that of those not born — I do not mean abortions, although abortions are part of it — I mean those families that never form and never fully form — the West has reached what seems a dead end.

A war of killing seems unnecessary. Why would there be one?

[j-damn]

*A war of killing seems unnecessary. Why would there be one?*

Was it necessary in 1914?
Was it necessary in 1939?

Whatever reasons one can ponder will be supplied. Just like the West strung Hitler along, so too do we string along the Muslims. After the nuclear Pearl Harbor, we’ll tear down and rebuilt the world order.

Later, rinse, repeat.

[unkus]

I won’t participate. To hell with them.

[unkus]

Because EVIL is alive and well.

[Jack Black]

A war of killing seems unnecessary. Why would there be one? Imagine the welfare state falls. Imagine that the huge urban ghettos no longer get food stamps, or money, or free stuff. How long before the riots start? How long before the riots spread to areas where people have stuff and a will to resist? How long before the news vultures are reporting on the 'white supremicist enclaves genocide of hungry, innocent people of color'?

There is no way something as big as the welfare state can collapse without violence, given that our society is armed to the teeth, made up of people who don't like each other much, and living in close proximity.