Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kukaniloko
"His 2012 opponents likely have standing on certain causes of actions pre-election."

No question. If the RNC or the Republican nominee wanted to explore this controversy, and to litigate it, standing,justiciability to include the courts ability to provide a remedy, would all easily be met. The case would be heard and decided entirely on its merits. And, it's a case that could be hear in either federal courts, or any of the other 50 state courts. Challenges to ballot access are litigated all the time.

66 posted on 10/29/2009 10:50:27 AM PDT by OldDeckHand (Obamacare - So bad, even Joe Lieberman isn't going to vote for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand
If the RNC or the Republican nominee wanted to explore this controversy, and to litigate it...

....But we know that the RNC will do no such thing. If the DNC actually did nominate a constitutionally unqualified candidate in 2008, and the RNC and their candidate failed to challenge him on that basis, and he was elected and inaugurated, and now the courts are refusing to hear further challenges because of standing and judicial restraint, then the electoral process has grandly failed the American people.
84 posted on 10/29/2009 10:56:09 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

Here we go again???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw


250 posted on 10/29/2009 12:57:34 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson