It has nothing to do with disagreement, it does have to do with the law and the Constitution - she misrepresents both.
“It has nothing to do with disagreement, it does have to do with the law and the Constitution - she misrepresents both.”
That is your opinion. It is not illegal to disagree with you in constitutional debate and in cases before courts where there is disagreement on constitutional cases. If so, a lot of people would be disbarred, fined, etc. If BamBam has his way, they would be jailed for constitutional disagreement with him. You are being silly now.