Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlo
He didn't state anything like that.

Note my "in effect."
Judge Carter's desire for constitutionality was entirely focused on the separation of powers idea. The constitutionality of Barry in the Oval Office is what I was referring to. Voters trump Constitution. Why else refer to the millions of people who voted for the (possibly unqualified) candidate?
212 posted on 10/29/2009 12:21:31 PM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]


To: Genoa

Completely wrong ... voters do not trump the Constitution. The people can change the Constitution, in a preascribed manner, but the majority opinion is not the rule of law in America. So if Carter has stated this erroneous notion, he is in fundamental error toward the oath he took.


217 posted on 10/29/2009 12:25:36 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson