Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Man50D

I live in a city that was one of the early adopters of Agenda 21, shortly after the conference in Rio de Janiero.

http://www.waitakere.govt.nz is the website for our city.

The focus of successive City Councils for the past 15 years has been on sustainable living. And, to be honest, it has worked extremely well.

Prior to the focus on sustainability, West Auckland was a hole, a nasty smelly place that was undesirable to live in. Now, it has got to be one of the most livable places on this planet.

So, based on what has happened here, I think this article is overly shrill. Every once in a while, by accident, even the United Nations might just get something right.


2 posted on 10/28/2009 3:48:02 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DieHard the Hunter
Sustainable living initiatives that are applied to existing urban areas are not the big concern here. Clearly, the problem is the "de-ruralization", or forcing rural dwellers together into existing or new urban areas.

I'm curious, though... what did a focus on sustainable living do to make West Auckland less smelly and undesirable -- and why were the problems that caused those conditions not able to be fixed before?

5 posted on 10/28/2009 4:53:39 AM PDT by Charles Martel ("Endeavor to persevere...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson