[FormerRep]

Try finding any science on the other side.

[metmom]

(Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution, p. 116 (Regnery, 2000).)Archaeopteryx isn’t the only evolutionary icon losing its claim as the ancestor of birds. In recent months we’ve seen paleontologists increasingly arguing that the entire clade of dinosaurs should no longer be considered ancestral to birds.

Is this inaccurate?

[G Larry]

The scientific support for creation are the myriad of broken theories and attempts to explain away creation, using half-assed extrapolations that simply don't hold together.
Pretending that adaptation within a species explains transition from one species to another.
Then reverting to redefining species to rationalize the the phony stories.
Watching over the decades as charlatans attempt to use evolution to explain away God.
As though we're here by accident and without purpose....