[holden]

Being marginal, on the basis of being unpopular or "bringing little to the table" is a very different circumstance than the
White House using its political clout to enlist friendly news outlets to gang up and marginalize Fox News, despite the latter's news organization's huge popularity and unique programming from across the wide spectrum of political thought, or lack thereof, as the tingles may be.

Any sixth grader can see Fox News brings a lot to the world and national news. But the WH activity is a hugely corrupt attempt to censor a free press, IMHO, it is impeachable for Barry and his minions to have instigated it, as such activity violates Barry's oath "to preserve, protect and defend" the US Constitution.

It's amazing that these things about "marginal" and "marginalize" should have to be explained, but I guess some people are thrown off by use of varying forms of the same root word.

HF

[Dr. Ursus]

Good analysis.