Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlo
As I said, their relationships were contemporaneous. They knew him. They traveled with him. They wrote their memories and accounts of him down on paper. Flavius Josephus wrote historical references about him.

None of that exists for Mohammed.

And don't drag wikipedia into a discussion of Jesus. Come on.

533 posted on 10/27/2009 8:51:23 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 529 | View Replies ]


To: Deb
"As I said, their relationships were contemporaneous. They knew him. They traveled with him. They wrote their memories and accounts of him down on paper. Flavius Josephus wrote historical references about him."

All that is known about those relationships is what is written in the gospels and as noted, those accounts are not contemporaneous. And the apostles are not known to have written them.

It's not all that different from Mohammed.

"And don't drag wikipedia into a discussion of Jesus. Come on."

I'm not citing Wikipedia as an authority, I'm pointing to an article that simply explains the facts, which happen to be correct.

548 posted on 10/27/2009 10:51:39 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson