To be frank, I am not prepared to say that "we know" Obama was not born in Hawaii.
The problem is -- ironically -- that we know so little about him.
What in Gods Name is he hiding?
Why is he spending large amounts of money in order to prevent discovery of his vital records?
To a reasonable man -- with a modicum of common sense -- his behaver is mighty suspicious, to say the least.
In order to get a Real Estate license, in California, I had to not only send a copy of my birth certificate, I was required to have my finger prints scanned and sent to the FBI for investigation, along with sworn discloser's of ANY misdemeanors in my past -- including my Juvenal records.
All of the above, of course, was to make REASONABLY sure that I was honest and upright and not a con man or a cheat.
If I would have refused to disclose my past because there was something "embarrassing" -- even IF I, in fact, were an honest man -- the authorities would have refused to issue me a California Real Estate licence.
Now, if I WERE a fraud and cheat, I could hurt a few people, but if the President is a fraud and cheat: he can damage millions of people.
Why should he be held to a lower slandered than you or I?
This is the executive office of the President of the United Stes we are talking about!
It just doesn't make sense.
Thank you for your reply.
STE=Q
To be frank, I am not prepared to say that “we know” Obama was not born in Hawaii.
The problem is — ironically — that we know so little about him.
What in Gods Name is he hiding?
Why is he spending large amounts of money in order to prevent discovery of his vital records?
To a reasonable man — with a modicum of common sense — his behaver is mighty suspicious, to say the least.
In order to get a Real Estate license, in California, I had to not only send a copy of my birth certificate, I was required to have my finger prints scanned and sent to the FBI for investigation, along with sworn discloser’s of ANY misdemeanors in my past — including my Juvenal records.
All of the above, of course, was to make REASONABLY sure that I was honest and upright and not a con man or a cheat.
If I would have refused to disclose my past because there was something “embarrassing” — even IF I, in fact, were an honest man — the authorities would have refused to issue me a California Real Estate licence.
Now, if I WERE a fraud and cheat, I could hurt a few people, but if the President is a fraud and cheat: he can damage millions of people.
Why should he be held to a lower slandered than you or I?
This is the executive office of the President of the United Stes we are talking about!
It just doesn’t make sense.
Thank you for your reply.
STE=Q
TYPOS:
slandered = standered / Stes = States