I can’t imagine that GGG would post a creationist article that disagrees with him on this incredibly important point.
<><><><><><><<>
GGG routinely posts articles in which explicit statements about an old earth are made.
They are also, at least in his eyes, critical of some element of evolutionary theory (do I have that about right, GGG?), so much so that, again in GGG’s eyes, they invalidate evolutionary theory, thereby contributing to the foundering and sinking of the HMS Darwin (to use GGG’s colorful language).
Add to that, the belief espoused by some (I think you have given this one the thumbs up, GGG) on the various crevo threads, that a multi billion year old universe and a 6000 year old earth owe their existence to the same creation event.
Therefore, any article critical of any element of evolutionary theory can be used, because with the notion of above, the age of the universe is no longer an obstacle.
I confess I’m not nearly smart enough (’cuz I’m an evo-atheist, Nazi communist Christ denying monkey lover - who kicks small dogs as I can have no moral underpinnings given my secular humanism) to grasp the idea behind the multi billion year old universe and the 6000 year old earth emanating from the same creation event.
Hey, I resemble that remark...except need to add uncooth, void of civility, and of course, plain stupid.
You’r part right. Biblical YECs for the most part merely point to Dr. Humphreys’ white hole cosmology that utilizes Einstein’s GR to show that it is possible to have a young earth, and distant stars that are millions or billions of years old, and yet both owe their existence to the exact same creation event. It has to do with gravitational time dilation, a bounded Universe with a center of mass, and our galaxy being at or near said center of mass. And, as it turns out, the cosmic evos are starting to admit (even if they are loath to admit it!), that it appears that we are at the center of something, such as a cosmic void, or even (Darwin forbid!) the center of the Universe. Of course, Dr. Humphreys has been writing books and papers making this very point for close to two decades.
As for posting ID articles, I disagree with (and try to avoid), ID articles that accept or push an old Earth. However, sometimes I will post an ID article or paper, even if it contains old Earth assumptions, if the paper has something profound to say about the argument from design, or otherwise falsifies some important aspect of materialist evolution.