Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: whattajoke; -YYZ-

You are right, I generally do flit in and flit out. I used to spend lots of time debating evos, including evo scientists, but I found that no matter how many times I demonstrated that Creation/ID is superior to Darwin’s fanciful creation myth, they clung to their evo-religion regardless. Indeed, I even used to set up debate threads, and ping all the evos to them. But alas, one by one they would all start dropping from the thread like flies, until it was just a bunch of Creationists and IDers talking to each other. So what’s the point? Besides, the articles and papers I post pretty much speak for themselves—and rarely does an evo come along with a comment that warrants any further elaboration on my part.

As for your comments about IDers and OECs. You will notice that I don’t post articles by OECs (proper), but I do post occasional articles and papers from an ID perspective. Can you guess why that is? You probably should’t bother, however, as I’m not sure I would tell you why, even if you guessed correctly.

All the best—GGG


45 posted on 10/20/2009 2:40:09 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts
the articles and papers I post pretty much speak for themselves

On that, we agree heartily.
46 posted on 10/20/2009 2:49:28 PM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

No offense, but I don’t believe there is much in the way of anything to be achieved by debating between YECs and those who have a more empirical approach to the world. Our world views are just too far apart. The concept of Biblical inerrancy and a literal reading of the Bible just doesn’t make sense to me. I think we’ll have to agree to disagree. Keep posting, though - I find your posts interesting even if I don’t share your belief system.


47 posted on 10/20/2009 4:22:09 PM PDT by -YYZ- (Strong like bull, smart like ox.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

To actually debate people you have to have a grasp of the subject you are debating. You obviously don’t. You yourself said you have no science background.
When asked for evidence you link to creationist magazines with no scientific proof to back them. Your lack of science education doesn’t allow you to realize the lack of any evidence for your point.
You then resort to name calling and attacking others, calling them atheists because they aren’t in lockstep with you.
You also post bible references (a religious document)when scientific documentation is asked for.
I believe that you think that the bible is the ultimate reference document on biology, chemistry, physics, cosmology, geology and any other -ology out there.


48 posted on 10/20/2009 7:02:48 PM PDT by Wacka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts; whattajoke; -YYZ-
"You probably should’t bother, however, as I’m not sure I would tell you why, even if you guessed correctly."

Because you [ggg] never had a clue in the first place.

50 posted on 10/21/2009 3:50:25 AM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson