Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Finding a new model for news reporting
Washington Post ^ | October 19, 2009 | Leonard Downie Jr. and Michael Schudson

Posted on 10/19/2009 6:21:54 AM PDT by La Lydia

News reporting that holds accountable those with power and influence has been a vital part of American democratic life, especially in places with daily newspapers profitable enough...to maintain substantial reporting staffs. That journalism is now at risk...American society must now take some collective responsibility for supporting news reportings....In a comprehensive report commissioned by the Columbia University Journalism School, we suggest a number of public sources of support for this news reporting:

- The Internal Revenue Service or Congress should clarify tax regulations to explicitly allow new or existing local news organizations to operate as nonprofit or low-profit entities, allowing them to receive tax-deductible donations, along with advertising revenue and other income.

- Philanthropists and foundations should substantially increase support for local news reporting to levels they provide for arts, cultural and educational institutions.

- Public radio and television should be substantially reoriented, through action by and reform of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, to provide significant local news reporting in every community served by public stations...

- Universities and colleges should become institutional sources of local, state and accountability news reporting, following the lead of pioneering journalism schools whose faculty and student journalists staff community news and investigative reporting Web sites.

- A national Fund for Local News should be created with fees the Federal Communications Commission collects from or could impose on telecom users, broadcast licensees or Internet service providers. Grants should be made competitively by independent state Local News Fund Councils to local news organizations for innovations in local news reporting and ways to support it.

- Governments, nonprofit organizations and journalists should increase the accessibility and usefulness of public information collected by federal, state and local governments, taking advantage of digital tools to analyze and use it for news reporting...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barfalert; journalism; jumpedtheshark; leonarddownie; propaganda; thoughtcrime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: La Lydia
American society must now take some collective responsibility for supporting news reportings....

Says it all.

21 posted on 10/19/2009 7:18:42 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Boots

problem: the internet does not get news, reporters do. And reporters must be paid or they go find new jobs doing something else.

to pick a paper, The internet allows me to read the reporting and opion pieces of the Boston Globe about national figures from Mass. and about the local impact of national issues. My reading Boston Globe online, second hand means they get no ad revenue from me. If the Globe goes under, then I don’t get to read for free anymore.

It seems to me we need the newspapers to improve the quality of thier reporting, not die.


22 posted on 10/19/2009 7:21:47 AM PDT by lack-of-trust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

All of the author’s argument can be boiled down to: we are failing in the free enterprise system and we want a government bailout!


23 posted on 10/19/2009 7:26:47 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loveliberty2

“... Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe.”

I can’t help being cynical here. So THAT’s why families and education are constantly being weakened: So the people can’t read.

That along with neutering the free press ...

TJ must be rolling in his grave.


24 posted on 10/19/2009 7:32:36 AM PDT by Cloverfarm (Obama = Nixon II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lack-of-trust
If the Globe goes under, then I don’t get to read for free anymore.

A couple of twenty something young people went to a few Acorn offices and gathered and reported more news than the Boston Globe has in years. Most of what newspapers "report" today is spoon fed to them by some party, agency, governmental official, special interest group, etc. In other words, they stopped reporting the news a long time ago and that is the principle for their impending failure.

To say that a healthy free enterprise system won't create a different model for gathering and delivering news is like saying Americans will stop driving cars if GM and Chrysler go under.

25 posted on 10/19/2009 7:36:29 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

a new model? does she have red hair?


26 posted on 10/19/2009 7:42:45 AM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
Are you kidding me? A snippet from the paper version page 19A:

American society must take some collective responsibility for fostering a new journalism ecosystem that is emerging with the help of foundations, philanthopists, universities and citizen donors.

Hey, let's just forget the whole concept of pesky capitalism at all while we're at it - if your business fails, get a bailout or become a non-profit! This whole "market-driven" theory and economy is overrated. We should model ourselves on the wonderful work that Chavez has done in Venezuela. The Whitehouse should have even more "control" of the media. The internet and Fox news are interfering with our plans for the country./s


27 posted on 10/19/2009 7:52:29 AM PDT by khnyny (We did it for the show!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

“American society must now take some collective responsibility for supporting news reportings.”

We do, have you noticed no one is watching the MSM news any longer except empty seats in airports.


28 posted on 10/19/2009 7:54:33 AM PDT by edcoil (If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loveliberty2
Great quotes. We often forget that our Founding Fathers understood completely the necessary elements for a free, functioning society - thanks for posting. I might add that it would be nice if this was required reading in our public school system.

The MSM currently reeks of desperation and in that desperation they have inadvertently dropped their mask and simultaneously realize that they are losing the stranglehold grip that they enjoyed in years past. With the advent of the internet, everyday citizens can reveal what's been studiously hidden in the past. Truth sells.


29 posted on 10/19/2009 8:10:41 AM PDT by khnyny (We did it for the show!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lack-of-trust

Many of the good reporters leave and go into PR or some other field where they actually make a living wage.

I make enough to survive as a reporter (since my wife also works), but not enough to really have much of a savings account.

There is an opportunity I think for good journalists to put together online ventures and get rid of the problem of all the expense running a printing press and massive staff.

But, it’s not easy. I have tried to think of a way to go do it, and I haven’t come up with anything that would be really doable to even start on a reporter’s salary.

It’s sad because journalism is critical to this country and to every community, and I think newspapers are only going to get worse as they have to cut staff as advertising revenues continue to decline.

Online is the future, but how we get there....nobody knows.

Putting it frankly, blogs can’t cut it and many small online ventures only have one reporter. That’s just not enough to do a good job.


30 posted on 10/19/2009 8:11:51 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Len, Mike...consider for a moment the Machiavellian possibilities of reporting the facts without fear, favor or affection, the way you’re supposed to.


31 posted on 10/19/2009 8:21:59 AM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: khnyny

The place of “citizen donors” used to be taken up by “investors.” For a couple of hundred years, newspapers were owned by individuals and families who made a decent living from them. These people and families had a vested interest in serving the communities THEY lived in with real, accurate, information. I’m not saying they were always balanced, but they at least attempted to be. Then there came a time when they were bought up wholesale by large corporations, such as Gannett, McClatchy, etc., the managers of which began to see themselves as “players” on the national political scene. At the same time, they allowed their reporters to write editorials in the place there were supposed to be news stories. These corporations drove them into the ground. To this day, there are profitable, hometown newspapers being operated.


32 posted on 10/19/2009 9:11:01 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Bookmark ping for later.


33 posted on 10/19/2009 9:17:23 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

34 posted on 10/19/2009 9:21:22 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Excellent points - I hadn’t thought of it in quite that way. The historical time line seems pretty accurate.

People and reporters who are local have a vested interest in the health and welfare of that locality, unless they’ve been financially comproprised by some outside influence.

That same reasoning can be extrapolated to multi-national corporations in general as well. The obvious question being, do they care about particular local populations health and welfare? They virtually have no country and imho, it appears a lot of them have kissed the US goodbye, despite the rhetoric to the contrary.


35 posted on 10/19/2009 9:47:24 AM PDT by khnyny (We did it for the show!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: khnyny

Of course, other elements have come into play that have not helped newspapers. Stiff competition from other kinds of advertising, the fact that the public schools no longer turn out truly literate readers (also, the public schools churn out millions of kids with short attention spans), and finally the devastation of our national paper manufacturing industry. The environmental movement ran it into the ground. There are only one or two remaining paper mills producing newsprint in our entire country, there is no competition or large-scale capability, so it is expensive, and most of it has to be imported. That is one of the reasons newspapers are getting smaller and smaller.


36 posted on 10/19/2009 10:02:51 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: stormer
Given his support for public education and its democratizing effects, Jefferson would probably be in favor of many of the components of this proposal.

I doubt very much that Jefferson would be in favor of FEDERAL control of education, and probably not even of STATE control. I do believe he'd be opposed to his children being forcibly indoctrinated with ideas that he opposes.

I think there was (and still is) a lot of unanimity around the idea that children should be taught to read, to write clearly, to think clearly and to have a solid foundation in facts. I don't think Jefferson would at all been in favor of mandatory public education where they taught the divine right of kings back then, nor of the rights to other folks property and labor being taught now.

37 posted on 10/19/2009 2:13:15 PM PDT by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: slowhandluke

>>I do believe he’d be opposed to his children
>>being forcibly indoctrinated with ideas that he opposes.

“I swear upon the altar of God, eternal hostility to every form of tyranny over the mind of man.”

Yep.


38 posted on 10/20/2009 7:44:30 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson