[BlueDragon]

See no censorship? ...maybe, maybe not. Perhaps you missed this qualifying statement from the ID proponents wishing to air the film;

Contract “issues” always make a nice pretext for censorship, but a little digging into history uncovers what likely took place.

Here we see the the ID'ers admitting they're guessing as to underlying motive. Personally, I think they have a point, regardless of the technicality.

If you are arguing that the contract technicality itself, is the full and complete story, I'd guess you might do well selling used cars, or in a government job, or in politics??? Aim High! --- like the saying goes...you show promise! /s

[Ira_Louvin]

Did the D.I. issue the press release?

Was the press release approved?

Does the rental contract not state that all promotional materials require approval prior to printing or broadcast?

Do the id/creationists/cdesign proponentsist have a separate set of rules from everybody else wishing to rent this space?