[Huck]

You're arguing that the "Federal Judiciary is too powerful" while simultaneously demanding that it usurp powers explicitly delegated to Congress.

Incorrect. I'm demonstrating that the Court is not a reliable instrument for restraining the expansion of federal power; that in fact it is a consistent agent of federal expansion of power.

You are now begging the question of what power the commerce clause conferred on Congress. It apparantly doesn't mean what it meant. It means whatever you or the Court or Congress wants it to mean, and apparantly you're ok with that.

The commerce clause was understood to mean something specific and limited, not something universal and all-encompassing. The fact that you embrace such an absurd construction is telling.

[Mojave]

I'm demonstrating that the Court is not a reliable instrument for restraining the expansion of federal power

The Court should not be a super-legislative body, making policy as it chooses. Congress makes policy.