Your entire post completely ignores the original meaning of the interstate commerce clause. You can’t even get to Scalia’s reasoning without accepting Wickard. And if you accept Wickard, you are by definition a liberal justice.
Nonsense. Raich provided NO substantiation for her assertion that her drug dealing would be entirely intrastate in nature.
You want the court to legislate from the bench based on her absurd hypothetical. You can't go more hardcore left than that.
And if you accept Wickard, you are by definition a liberal justice.
Have you ever read it? If so, perhaps you could explain how a judicially invented Marketing Card entitlement should theoretically work.