Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mojave

Your entire post completely ignores the original meaning of the interstate commerce clause. You can’t even get to Scalia’s reasoning without accepting Wickard. And if you accept Wickard, you are by definition a liberal justice.


50 posted on 10/16/2009 9:57:56 AM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
Your entire post completely ignores the original meaning of the interstate commerce clause. You can’t even get to Scalia’s reasoning without accepting Wickard.

Nonsense. Raich provided NO substantiation for her assertion that her drug dealing would be entirely intrastate in nature.

You want the court to legislate from the bench based on her absurd hypothetical. You can't go more hardcore left than that.

And if you accept Wickard, you are by definition a liberal justice.

Have you ever read it? If so, perhaps you could explain how a judicially invented Marketing Card entitlement should theoretically work.

56 posted on 10/16/2009 10:06:41 AM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson