[CharlesWayneCT]

I had no qualms about your discussion of the study and it’s limitations — that’s what I asked you to do in my other post, which was a response to a different comment where you attributed the study information to me, and I wanted to correct you.

I appreciate that you posted the actual graph showing that, IN THE STUDY, their data said the safest group was those with 5000-9999 hours. That’s what I said in my post, and the graph you posted shows that I posted the facts as presented by the study.

I appreciate your expert analysis of the study and your opinion as to why the raw data of the study wasn’t germaine.

I did notice the study was more about age of pilots, not experience.

I haven’t been able to find any other study online that shows death rate vs. experience. You have implied that this data is known, and that experience reduces the death rate. Could you please post the actual data that shows this to be the case?

Because I tried, but apparently the study I posted was inadequate. You are the expert, so please provide me the data that would be factual so I can see. Thanks.

[zipper]

I appreciate that you posted the actual graph showing that, IN THE STUDY, their data said the safest group was those with 5000-9999 hours. That’s what I said in my post, and the graph you posted shows that I posted the facts as presented by the study.

I appreciate your expert analysis of the study and your opinion as to why the raw data of the study wasn’t germaine.

It wasn't my opinion. It was the opinion of the authors of the study. The study you misrepresented, as I demonstrated.