Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prof. Jorgen
I think this case is currently waiting for a ruling on a motion to dismiss, so it's a little premature to be talking dates for a jury trial just yet.

The one thing Judge Carter did order last week was to make the dates final. Including the dates for a motion for summary judgment and the trial date.

If the Motion to dismiss is not granted, I'd think the case will be settled by summary judgment after discovery.

235 posted on 10/14/2009 12:00:21 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
The one thing Judge Carter did order last week was to make the dates final. Including the dates for a motion for summary judgment and the trial date.

I agree, although in his subsequent denial of Orly's request to lift the discovery stay, he said that the parties could move for extensions of time -- which would change the "final" dates.

If the Motion to dismiss is not granted, I'd think the case will be settled by summary judgment after discovery.

I agree that the case will probably be resolved on summary judgment motion if it goes forward.
243 posted on 10/14/2009 12:34:09 PM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

To: El Gato
The one thing Judge Carter did order last week was to make the dates final. Including the dates for a motion for summary judgment and the trial date.

If the Motion to dismiss is not granted, I'd think the case will be settled by summary judgment after discovery.


Yes, he finalized the calendar but I think it's a mistake to go on TV talking about dates for a jury trial that you don't know if you'll have yet. It makes it too easy for people to dismiss what she's fighting for when she makes claims like that. Instead of people focusing on Obama, it gets people focused on her statement and if she's wrong or overstates it like she did with her appeal to the Supreme Court, claiming it being sent to conference was a 'warning to Obama' and that it would be heard...well, we all found out that wasn't the case and it made it easy for everyone to ignore the actual case and why it's important to bring it to court!

I guess I'd go with the more cautious approach to public statements and let discovery speak for itself when it happens, there will be no way to ignore or ridicule that!
282 posted on 10/14/2009 1:55:57 PM PDT by Prof. Jorgen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson