Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tired_old_conservative

I hear you sir, and will only point out, that the Judge was in error in the interpleadings where he said that she first dropped the officer, then refiled recklessly. In fact, she responsibly filed for the remaining clients she was trying to protect. She covered this on her website.
I agree that she is alot over the top, but I really think this judge wanted to shut her up, for the purposes of NOT hearing this case on its merits...

Anyway...she is never boring...that’sa for sho...


127 posted on 10/14/2009 4:26:29 PM PDT by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: etraveler13
the Judge was in error in the interpleadings where he said that she first dropped the officer, then refiled recklessly. In fact, she responsibly filed for the remaining clients she was trying to protect. She covered this on her website.

Whatever it says on her website, the actual motion for reconsideration has been posted here on FR and it was brought only on behalf of Captain Rhodes, who had already fired her. So it was actually sanctionable regardless of its tone, although the tone is what did her in (as it should have).

132 posted on 10/14/2009 4:55:13 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson