She has seen this Judge exactly twice. In that time, he has done his own job of going berserk. She released her client before proceeding, and rather, refiled for the 48 other clients faced with the same problem. The military did not excuse them, and so the judge would have to hear the case, or throw her out, the easiest way is to quote misbehaviour, she tried to have him recuse himself. IMO if he had done so, it is just possible that another judge would hear the case, and see that HE was as unreasonable as she. The creates Judge presedence IMO... She had to go, and no other judge could hear the case....that again IMO is extreme prejudice...
I’m with you on the particulars in this case. And maybe there are other more respectable law firms waiting for her to self-implode, but right now Orly is Orly’s worst enemy.
The judge took time out of a busy schedule to arrange a special hearing for her. He produced a lucid opinion detailing via case law and precedent why the case she filed wasn't viable. The bases he cited for that conclusion are not new or controversial in the legal profession.
Judges declaring cases nonviable will often say things the proponents of that case find harsh. Tough luck. You should have filed a better case. As this same thing had happened before, he specifically told her not to do it again, as is the court's prerogative. Courts have pretty full dockets, and they don't have time to waste with rehearing the same case over and over again.
At that point, Orly acted like an aggrieved child instead of a lawyer. She filed a ludicrous brief whose obvious intention was to salve her wounded pride, filled with language so intemperate no lawyer would expect anything other than a sanction. Which is what happened.