No hate and it’s not about disagreeing.
Advocating for socialist or totalitarian government that violates the Constitution, is liberal and well, socialist.
But I’m not surprised that any evos can’t see that as they are the biggest defenders of government strong arm tactics of any on FR, from government control of schools, to restriction of religion, to mandatory vaccinations.
About the only issue I’ve seen FRevos consistently take a conservative position on is gun rights.
Insisting that teaching a religious view(creationism) as science is totalitarian. Teach creationism when the social studies class discusses religions. An example- I grew up in NY state. When we discussed the Iroquois, we heard about their creation story. That is the place for it. Not the science classroom.
When you can give me credible, real, scientific proof of ID or creationism, then it can be taught in science class.
This means well detailed , reproducible experiments that undergo peer review, not inaccurate reviews of real scientific articles with an opinion tacked on to the end.
Legitimate scientific review articles have dozens and dozens (if not hundreds) of references to other peer reviewed articles, not footnotes to someone’s opinion or bible verses.
Thusly, your definition of "conservative" must be flawed.....or you simply wanted to say something bogus.
Lesser government power, lower taxes, strong defense....nawwww....these cannot be conservative things.....and go ahead and ask "Frevos" what they think of these issues and you will get the same belief that you have....that is, IF you are a "conservative."
Hint: I wouldn't confuse or equate "conservative" with "CHRISTIAN conservative" any more than I would confuse or equate "conservative" with "Republican."
Nice qualifier "I haven't seen" is though....well, now you've "seen" a "FRevo" that shares 3 off the top of my head core conservative values without sharing your specific religious viewpoint on the origins of life.