Canedawg, you are innocently, I’m sure, being drawn into using an afterbirther troll tactic: “I’m against Obama too, but...” and then make Orly Taitz the issue. She is not the issue. If you’re against Obama (or whatever his name is) and you think his records need to made public, then please help.
I understand exactly what you are saying.
But as a conscientious particiant on Free Republic, and as someone who has a JD, I sometimes undertake to analyze and explain legal documents here so that other FReepers understand the legalese that is contained in these documents.
Last year I cautioned FReepers that the Berg case was in all likelihood not going to be satisfactorily resolved prior to the election, which of course turned out to be correct, although it may have disappointed some here.
My interpretation of developments in this litigation should not be confused with supporting those who may be DU trolls.
She IS the issue.
She's an incompetent nut and an embarrassment.
Obama could do worse than to hire her to put a clown's face on the whole issue.
Which begs the question. What constitutes “help”?
If I stood on a street corner dressed as a circus bear and wore a sandwich board that said: “Obama is from Jupiter! Not a Natural Born Citizen”, I cannot imagine you'd think I was helping much.
And you'd be right.
The point of such an extreme example is simply that just because someone opposes a particular tactic or approach, especially a questionable one, doesn't mean that they oppose a goal.
Some of those that are getting labeled as “Trolls” are actively working to put legislation on the books in their states requiring specific rules and requirements for candidates to demonstrate eligibility.