[mlo]

"How do you know you were born 35 years ago if no one confirmed it or witnessed it?"

It doesn't matter if I know it. It still happened. It is a fact in itself, because it did happen when it did. What people know about it is another question. A fact is true or not true, apart from whether anyone knows its truth.

"You may want to find someone you trust and dicsuss the flaw in your logic and why you have such an illogical expectation that prohibits candidates from being vetted."

No, you are attempting to jump ahead. If you can't even accept the notion that a thing is true whether anyone knows it is true or not, then there's nothing to build on. BTW, if you can't accept that notion you don't get to talk about supposed flaws in MY logic. :-)

[nufsed]

I cannot accept as a fact that which you have not shown to be true. I agree that it a fact that you were born. However, you have not shown that it is a fact that you are 35. I would agree that is a fact that you are between the ages of 13 and 130 based upon your vocabulary and the ages of men for the last century or so.

You can not establish a fact by stating it adamantly and saying that is it a fact. Your saying so does not make it factual. In fact, I believe you are making it up.

Your logic on the presidential qualifications is the same as you are demonstrating here, illogic.

[Vendome]

Yes. But shouldn't your fact have a requirement of proof and testing of the proof to ensure it's integrity and means of operation as a fact.

Shouldn't there be a requirement that your affidavit bear scrutiny of impeachability and it being unassailable?

[Vendome]

Meant to include you on response to 805

Yes. But shouldn’t your fact have a requirement of proof and testing of the proof to ensure it’s integrity and means of operation as a fact.

Shouldn’t there be a requirement that your affidavit bear scrutiny of impeachability and it being unassailable?