Since you do not understand that SCOTUS does not MAKE LAW... this is the duty of Congress... then there is no hope for you.
What in Hades does this mean:
"Since there is no definition in the law of natural born citizen, the SCOTUS must look outside of the law for an answer. "???
Where should they look? Kenya? France? Britain? Inside your twisted brain?
You say you respect the law, but then think it's okay for an activist court to make the law from the bench?
I have not joined in most of these threads because it's easy to see that you and your posse troll them 24/7 and I frankly have to earn an honest living outside of following your so called "birther" threads. Your last line shows me just who and what you are - you deny that there is a problem with activist courts and you disparage any and all who would protest this activism that is tearing apart the fabric of our Constitution and Bill of Rights.
You sir may not be the worst troll I've seen on FR, but troll you are and I am ashamed of those longtime Freepers who join you in attacks on those who feel strongly regarding the complete and total lack of documentation of this President's life. Those who feel it is not important to see these documents could argue their merits without the name calling, yet good little Alinsky-ites they have shown themselves to be!
I haven't resorted to name calling. I make a point not to do so.
Since there is no definition in the law of natural born citizen, the SCOTUS must look outside of the law for an answer.
That would be a paraphrased quote from the Chief Justice in the SCOTUS ruling on Minor v. Happersett. If you had any knowledge, at all, of the law on this issue, you would know that. You'd also realize that SCOTUS, in interpretting the law, essentially does make law/policy. That's evidenced by the precedents set in their opinions.
Nothing else in your post deserves acknowledgment.
If SCOTUS does not make law, explain Roe vs Wade? It is rhetorical, of course, by operation they should not be able to make law but an activist court often does, by way of the defined ruling.