To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"When you say no law was violated, sounds to me like you believe the current prez what properly vetted by every sec of state." If "properly" means they followed the law, then yes. They did.
If "properly" means they demanded the proof you demand, then no, they didn't. But what you demand is not the law. That's the point.
309 posted on
10/13/2009 11:10:55 AM PDT by
mlo
To: mlo
Do you have an example of a sec of state showing that the current prez is eligible? They can’t know if a candidate is eligible without vetting him first.
311 posted on
10/13/2009 11:14:35 AM PDT by
Freedom2specul8
(I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
To: mlo
Wait, to quote pissant to save time, “age, years living here, and Natural Born status to the letter. No more, no less.”, that’s not the law?
315 posted on
10/13/2009 11:18:28 AM PDT by
Freedom2specul8
(I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson