Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"When you say no law was violated, sounds to me like you believe the current prez what properly vetted by every sec of state."

If "properly" means they followed the law, then yes. They did.

If "properly" means they demanded the proof you demand, then no, they didn't. But what you demand is not the law. That's the point.

309 posted on 10/13/2009 11:10:55 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]


To: mlo

Do you have an example of a sec of state showing that the current prez is eligible? They can’t know if a candidate is eligible without vetting him first.


311 posted on 10/13/2009 11:14:35 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]

To: mlo

Wait, to quote pissant to save time, “age, years living here, and Natural Born status to the letter. No more, no less.”, that’s not the law?


315 posted on 10/13/2009 11:18:28 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson