Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gwilhelm56

Sure the M16A1 I had in Basic required a lot (and I mean a lot) of babying to keep it firing, but the A2 I had at all of my permanent duty stations worked fantastic, no matter how much I abused it. The M249s that I used worked great, when belt fed, but heaven forbid you stuck a magazine in the side of it! I was lucky to get off 2 rounds before it jammed.


5 posted on 10/11/2009 8:25:15 PM PDT by rivercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: rivercat

I bought a Springfield M1A based it’s reputation for reliability even when thrown in mud, dirt and run over.

I have purposely not cleaned it for my own testing purposes for the last 8 months.

No problem and I have used So. African and Russian surplus, just because they are dirty and oily.

No problems and I have put National Match in. They are great but at $2.50 per round I don’t need that kind of accuracy.

I will thouroghly clean it for Christmas but, I am pretty confident in its reliability and performance.


9 posted on 10/11/2009 8:47:18 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: rivercat

Interesting. Granted I was USAF and we almost never carried weapons unless you were security forces or deployed to a combat zone, but every year when I qualified, I had no issues with the m16. I am sure it was not the best gun, my sec forces friends all had their favorites.


12 posted on 10/11/2009 9:41:13 PM PDT by USAFJeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson