[Outlaw Woman]

Wow, what a story ... so, in 1983, there were pro-lifers already handing out graphic photos

Yes and I still have that paper. There were also pro-life marches in mid-80's.

The Times may be 'tardy' however, the fact that they even allowed the story is a huge move forward. They are plummeting in sales and I'm sure that factored into the decision to run the story as well (the libs always use a 'conservative' angle when they want to increase sales i.e. Hollywood,papers etc). Even if that was the reason, the information will reach many libs......some of them may even change their minds and that's all we care about isn't it?

[mlizzy]

The Times may be 'tardy' however, the fact that they even allowed the story is a huge move forward. They are plummeting in sales and I'm sure that factored into the decision to run the story as well (the libs always use a 'conservative' angle when they want to increase sales i.e. Hollywood,papers etc). Even if that was the reason, the information will reach many libs......some of them may even change their minds and that's all we care about isn't it?

It's indeed good to see the Truth in print, no matter what their agenda. I sometimes see the road to heaven about the width of a piece of dental floss. Other days I see it a little wider. Hence, the 'tardy' comment.