Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: astyanax

It’s not that I am familiar with the subject matter- i am just applying basic legal reasoning to the situation.

What is the prohibition specified in section(a)?

Whatever it is, the section you cited states it is inapplicable as it pertains to those contracts that MAY not be enforced in a US court.

The use of “may” is tricky. There may be another clause that specifies the contract wont be enforced in a US court, but if not, then “may” leaves an opening (compare if it said “shall” or “shall not”).

I hope this helps. Legalese isn’t always straightforward, LOL.


53 posted on 10/08/2009 12:00:17 PM PDT by Canedawg (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Canedawg

It’s from the actual amendment, which I posted here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2357517/posts?page=46#46


54 posted on 10/08/2009 12:11:36 PM PDT by astyanax (Liberalism: Logic's retarded cousin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson