Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
"Wrong. The burden of proof is on Obama, not me."

No, there is no burden on Obama to do anything at this point.

Look, you can't just throw stuff out there and say it has to be a certain way, just because you say so. This is the basic point both I and NS are making here.

Where is the law? If you want to claim Obama has to fork over a specific document, show the law that says that very thing. If you want to claim he has the burden of proof, show the law that says that. Otherwise, you shouldn't make those kinds of claims. That's all.

923 posted on 10/08/2009 9:43:38 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 915 | View Replies ]


To: mlo
If you want to claim he has the burden of proof, show the law that says that.

The easy to understand words of our Constitution have been posted on this thread repeatedly. I can't help it if you choose to ignore them.

"No person except a natural born Citizen...shall be eligible to the Office of President...."

934 posted on 10/08/2009 9:52:04 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Darkness has no response to light, except to flee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 923 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson