So where does the Constitution outline what candidates have to do to prove their natural-born citizenship requirements?
Why am I not surprised that you need an "outline" in order to demand that our elected officials simply follow the clearest provisions of the Constitution? At least when it suits your purposes.
So where does the Constitution outline what candidates have to do to prove their natural-born citizenship requirements?
There is no reason why there should be any outline of what a natural born citizen is in the constitution, the framers understood the concept well enough that they were not afraid of a pretender sneaking into the office of the presidency.
What has happened her is treason on a scale that it boggles the mind, not only was a fraud allowed to run for office but the entire party that he represented was perfectly willing to allow him to lie his way into office because they knew they didn't have anyone else to run and win.
You asked me the same question.
I answered it, and showed you in the constitution exactly where it specifies that the office requires that the candidate be a “Natural Born” citizen, and why.
What is gained by asking different people the same question?
You know the answer...time to move on, unless that is all you have, which is pathetic.