Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rolling_stone
Oh for crying out loud the law at least is implied,

Which means it's open to interpretation. Why is your interpetation correct and his is not?

...tell me why federal law enforcement officers carry guns and what law allows them to do so?

I'm betting that whatever law established the particular law enforcement agency also authorized them to carry guns.

835 posted on 10/08/2009 7:25:38 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 823 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

Oh for crying out loud the law at least is implied,
Which means it’s open to interpretation. Why is your interpetation correct and his is not?

I suggest you read up on implied law before you make any more ASSumptions.

...tell me why federal law enforcement officers carry guns and what law allows them to do so?

I’m betting that whatever law established the particular law enforcement agency also authorized them to carry guns.

Show me the law.


842 posted on 10/08/2009 7:37:07 AM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 835 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson