The Constitution required him to be a natural-born citizen. Obama said he was and posted his COLB on line to prove it, which is more than Kerry or Bush or Clinton or any prior president did. He says that proves he is a natural-born citizen. You say it doesn't. So what? Unless you can point to what proof of natural-born citizenship requires then you haven't grounds for complaint. The Constitution doesn't define it. Federal law doesn't identify it. And until it does Obama skates out of doing anything further.
Pretty thin gruel.
In 1968, Eldridge Cleaver was thrown off the California presidential ballot. You see, citizens pointed out that he didn’t meet the simple requirements of our Constitution needed to qualify for the Office of the President.
Last year, Roger Calero was removed from the ballots in multiple states, because citizens pointed out that he did not meet the simple requirements of the same section of the Constitution.
Both Cleaver and Calero CLAIMED to meet the requirements. Your argumentation here would suggest that all responsible officers of government should have just taken them at their word. After all, “no law exists.”
Fortunately, the responsible officers recognized their obligations UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES and removed both leftists from the ballot.
Please explain to us why the Leftist known as Obama deserves better treatment?