Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RegulatorCountry
It’s odd and inelegant because it lacks precision and is not rigorous, in a document of such serious import as our Constitution.

There is nothing odd or unrigorous about the fact that a citizen at birth is by definition a natural born citizen.

You’ve acknowledged that the several States determined birthright citizenship differently, curiosity.

So? Anyone who was a birthright citizen of at least one state was a birthright citizen of the United States. Whether he would have been considered a birthright citizen by the criteria of some other state was immaterial.

There was not a State in the nation, that would have deemed a Presidential candidate born abroad of citizen parents eligible.

Nonsense.

And, there were several States that would not have deemed a Presidential candidate born in one of the several States eligible, if that candidate was born of a foreign father.

That is simply not true. States never had the authority to determine who is or is not eligible to be president. So long as a person was a birthright citizen of at least one state, that person was eligible, regardless of the citizenship laws in other states.

1,628 posted on 10/12/2009 4:16:56 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1626 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity

Please cite the Constitutional Article and Clause stating this, curiosity.


1,630 posted on 10/12/2009 4:54:08 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1628 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson