I'm sorry, I'm not trying to be rude, but you are really confused.
We weren't talking about current statutes. I didn't say anything about current statutes. I'm responding to YOUR own point about Blackstone, so it's Blackstone I'm talking about.
The Blackstone quote you provided is about children born outside of the country, but you are using it to try to make a point about being born inside. Do you see how that can't work?
"... but NOT in the eyes of the Framers, or the British Crown, both using common law for a British Subject — Barack Hussein Obama SR"
In the eyes of the Framers, the British Crown, and British and US Common Law, someone born inside the country is a natural born citizen/subject.
You're stating opinion, and an ill-informed opinion at that.
| The Blackstone quote you provided is about children born outside of the country, but you are using it to try to make a point about being born inside. Do you see how that can't work? You are STILL missing this — and I'm sure at this point on purpose. Under the British common law as outlined by Blackstone — passing on subjugation from the FATHER to the child — Barack Obama SR's son was born out of Obama SR's native country of the United Kingdom in 1961. As such, Obama JR is still a "natural born subject" of the British crown. |