Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: etraveler13
How did we devolve this to an issue about John McCain, and not about Obama?

Because all legitimate discussion of eligibility under the Constitution drew to an abrupt halt, when it became clear that Barack Hussein Obama, II was himself questionable. Obama never was beneficiary of such Senatorial collegiality as was John McCain. Where is Obama's Senate Resolution? He has none.

Perhaps some of the information I posted which were from other locations that I supplied links to, got your panties in a knot, for that I am sorry, and wish to state that my interest is in Obama, not McCain.

Your quaint, derisive colloquialisms aside, the operation of our Constitutional Republic is what it is. You've made repeated misstatements, and I've corrected them. Whether your misstatements pertain to McCain, Obama or whomever, even Bobby Jindal, is irrelevant. But, you are the one who brought the topic into discussion, here.

I checked your note on the McCaskill bill, read it, and saw that it was stuck in committee and did not pass. To me that shows due diligence to your words.

I've shown far more understanding of the issue at hand than you've shown, etraveler13. That the Bill was not "passed" means what, exactly? It means that a Bill for Constitutional Amendment, allowing citizens born abroad to parents serving in the U.S. Armed Forces to be considered as natural-born citizens, is languishing in the Senate Judiciary Committee. It has not been "passed," let alone ratified. That you do not grasp the meaning of this, means that you don't understand this matter, at all.

Save your sarcasm for someone who cares BTW I've been far more polite than several other FReepers, with which you've exchanged replies, on this thread alone. You clearly do care, otherwise you wouldn't keep returning to your spurious claim that natural-born citizenship is determined via statute, as you have.

Repeated misstatements of fact do not make the misstatements factual, etraveler13, just as breaking the law does not revoke the law.

1,482 posted on 10/10/2009 12:33:59 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1477 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry

Because all legitimate discussion of eligibility under the Constitution drew to an abrupt halt, when it became clear that Barack Hussein Obama, II was himself questionable. Obama never was beneficiary of such Senatorial collegiality as was John McCain. Where is Obama’s Senate Resolution? He has none.


I find it humorous that he was a co-sponsor on the McCaskill bill personally....

Your quaint, derisive colloquialisms aside, the operation of our Constitutional Republic is what it is. You’ve made repeated misstatements, and I’ve corrected them. Whether your misstatements pertain to McCain, Obama or whomever, even Bobby Jindal, is irrelevant. But, you are the one who brought the topic into discussion, here.


Actually the article posted brought the topic into question.

I’ve shown far more understanding of the issue at hand than you’ve shown, etraveler13. That the Bill was not “passed” means what, exactly? It means that a Bill for Constitutional Amendment, allowing citizens born abroad to parents serving in the U.S. Armed Forces to be considered as natural-born citizens, is languishing in the Senate Judiciary Committee. It has not been “passed,” let alone ratified. That you do not grasp the meaning of this, means that you don’t understand this matter, at all.


I know that it has not passed. Is that not correct?

I have conversed with you and provided my reasoning, you don’t agree, fine.

If your a lawyer, say so, if your not, quit pretending to be.
On this board, I am trying to learn, if you can’t convince me, your not a very good teacher.
IMO you throw your weight around like a legal bully, yet cannot seem to put a cohesive understandable sentance together to convey your point. I have gone out of my way to explain what I understand and why, and where I derive my information. You reply with pompous insults and innuendo.
You must be a joy to work with...

Do you need to have the last word? Be my guest.


1,488 posted on 10/10/2009 1:54:56 PM PDT by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1482 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson