Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: etraveler13

I’m having trouble communicating with you. Go back to my post at 1344 (in response to your post at 1336) and tell me where you got the paragraph I italicized about natural born? It is not in any law statute or code. It is someone;s onpion, the question is who;s and why not state it as an opinion and reference it thanks.

I am well aware of immigration law and a foundling is of unknown parentage otherwise they would not be a foundling.(definition-unknown parentage)


1,359 posted on 10/09/2009 1:48:29 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1356 | View Replies ]


To: rolling_stone

Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.


http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_citi.html
Go down to the 4 paragraph, and you will find the wording your looking for, it is a discussion forum that specifies US Code:

If you go to Section 1401 of the US Code
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401——000-.html
It goes into even more detail

I hope I have answered your question.


1,363 posted on 10/09/2009 1:56:18 PM PDT by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1359 | View Replies ]

To: rolling_stone

Fondling? Erh, Foundlyin.

Correction you said foundling. lol

couldn’t resist.


1,374 posted on 10/09/2009 3:19:39 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1359 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson