Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bioqubit
The Italians built a carrier and the Chinese are still trying to figure it out?!?!?!? That is pathetic.

In terms of capabilities European carriers are toys, built more to assuage national prestige than to project power. In World War II this would have been a Jeep Carrier.

12 posted on 10/07/2009 7:28:28 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Don't tell 0bama what comes after a trillion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Depends on the conflict. In an all out conflict, such carriers would either escort supplies and small task forces (like Jeep Carriers) or would augment a US Carrier Strike group.

But, as the Falklands conflict showed, they can project power against enemies who themselves do not have a strong navy, particularly that do not have a strong air arm. They performed admirably in that role, though tere wer some significant UK naval losses to frigates and destroyers.

The Italians now have two such carriers, as do the Spanish.

France will utlimately have two larger carriers, and England has already started building their QE II class (of which they will build two), which will displace 65,000 tons and though at first a jump jet design, will also be designed from the keel up to allow for later cat installation if necessary.

33 posted on 10/07/2009 8:03:48 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson