Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: denydenydeny

Well think about it. What would tax cuts stimulate? Outside of moving money to lower income people who have higher marginal propensity to consume, no benefit that I can see. Who is likely to invest in new business with current demand levels? What new product would draw money in? We already have massive excess capacity. If there is a way it would help, I would love to know.

parsy, who just don’t see any real benefits to society at large


14 posted on 10/06/2009 11:09:25 PM PDT by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: parsifal
"Well think about it. What would tax cuts stimulate? Outside of moving money to lower income people who have higher marginal propensity to consume, no benefit that I can see."

It would do some good...in the USA of yesterday.

A working class man isn't even allowed to make useful little gadgets out of circuit components by himself. The corporate-sucking, anti-competition committees (planning and zoning fascists in most counties) have outlawed all useful kinds of small businesses.

There's nothing conservative, properly capitalistic or American about today's government or big business at any level. Although there's no single, comprehensive, great conspiracy to do so, we're seeing a many-pronged campaign of economic cleansing. It just sort of came together that way, but our superiors dismiss it with their yearning for depopulation (to the extent of decreasing the big number to a half a billion--the estimated population of their beloved, filthy Renaissance).


17 posted on 10/07/2009 12:18:33 AM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: parsifal

Tax cuts, BTW, would deprive the various offices of anti-competition (including family-busting social programs) of their jobs and control. ...problem is, neither Republicans nor Democrats will cut funding for such offices, because both political parties thrive by the various revenues from the same pool of favored constituents (free traitors and their relatives in government and academia). Even Reagan did not cut taxes. He only lessened the tax increases by advocating small cuts in social security, etc. (while increasing funding for the anti-family social programs). We’re seeing the beginnings of a worldwide fascist plutocracy.

We need men as leaders at every level of government and business. We haven’t had men as leaders for a very long time.


18 posted on 10/07/2009 12:30:33 AM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: parsifal

It’s quite simple, tax cuts mean more money in my pocket. More money in my pocket means I can pay off any debt I have. More money in my pocket means I can buy things which in turn employs someone to make the things I want to buy. Tax cuts are the only way to bring us back.


19 posted on 10/07/2009 1:48:49 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Looking for our Sam Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson