This was the biggest waste of my time to read. What exactly was the author’s intent? To preach to the choir about what creationists should think? About how to deny the appearance of fossils by saying “Oh - those aren’t feathers (fill in the blank with some other half cocked interpretation).” I’d like, just once - JUST ONCE - to see a scholarly article from any creation organization that actually gives a solid presentation without the standard reactionary BS slathered all over it. GGG, this wasn’t even a good article to stir debate. Anyone reading it would be better off skipping down to the references at the bottom and reading them instead - it’s pretty obvious that the author didn’t bother to read them.
As usual, you are all heat no light. But the fact that the article has got you all hot under the collar is a pretty good indication that it hit the bullseye.
Translation:
The article blew away whatever remained of your comical belief system.